Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2023/04/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] comparison of 4 noise reduction programs
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 05:50:02 -0500

Greetings to all.  The attached files are the same image processed in 4
noise reduction programs.  The base image was shot at 25600 ISO and cropped
to less than 50% of the image.  The camera was a Sony A1 and the lens was a
Sigma 105 F1.4 at 1.4.  Take a look and decide, the only processing was the
noise reduction, cropping, and lightening the overall image.

First is LR enhance:

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Noise/LR+enhance.jpg.html

Next is the older Topaz denoise:

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Noise/Topaz+denoise.jpg.html

Topaz AI:

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Noise/Topaz+AI_.jpg.html

DxO deep prime although not the strongest selection:

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Noise/DxO+deep+prime.jpg.html



-- 
Don
don.dory at gmail.com


Replies: Reply from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] comparison of 4 noise reduction programs)
Reply from hlritter at bex.net (Howard L Ritter Jr) ([Leica] comparison of 4 noise reduction programs)
Reply from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] comparison of 4 noise reduction programs)