Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2023/04/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]IMHO LR enhance wins hands down. I am really surprised by the lack of resolution and sharpness in the last three when viewed large. There is a noticeable difference in the last three in terms of quality even at "regular" size. Erwin would not be impressed :-) Just look at the difference in the pattern of the subjects sweater in each, let alone anything else. I can't help noticing that there is a crop or shift of the subject when viewed against the background in the later ones. I am surprised! Peter On 19/04/2023 11:50, Don Dory via LUG wrote: > Greetings to all. The attached files are the same image processed in 4 > noise reduction programs. The base image was shot at 25600 ISO and cropped > to less than 50% of the image. The camera was a Sony A1 and the lens was a > Sigma 105 F1.4 at 1.4. Take a look and decide, the only processing was the > noise reduction, cropping, and lightening the overall image. > > First is LR enhance: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Noise/LR+enhance.jpg.html > > Next is the older Topaz denoise: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Noise/Topaz+denoise.jpg.html > > Topaz AI: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Noise/Topaz+AI_.jpg.html > > DxO deep prime although not the strongest selection: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/don_dory_gmail_com/Noise/DxO+deep+prime.jpg.html > > > -- Dr. Peter Dzwig