Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2022/02/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] [LRflex] Re: Over-processed with a link
From: imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:15:12 +0000
References: <202229103912.365706@DESKTOP-UR7CQAT> <c37ee5e1-806c-1c94-720a-b4dd4fb0518e@gmail.com> <70288326-e6b1-e7aa-0db4-b987dda43ed2@iol.ie> <DM6PR04MB540305D256D18E02E18FBBFDB8319@DM6PR04MB5403.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Don't remember it, Aram. However, I've just glanced at the photos and 
have to say they're not my particular cup of tea, so maybe I saw it and 
mentally dismissed it. My loss and the all embracing world of art's 
gain, I'm afraid.

Douglas

On 12/02/2022 15:27, Aram Langhans via LUG wrote:
> Frank was referring to an email from the Leica Users Group.? Here is 
> the link for those interested in what started the whole discussion.
>
> https://petapixel.com/2022/02/02/the-winners-of-the-international-landscape-photographer-of-the-year-2021/
>  
>
>
> Aram
>
>
> On 2/9/2022 12:05 PM, Douglas Barry wrote:
>> Ermm, Frank, all very fascinating I'm sure. I know I've been busy, 
>> and may have overlooked the topic you are talking about, but I 
>> haven't seen anything on this topic on the LUG. Have you been over 
>> processing and included a process that should have been excluded - to 
>> whit the LUG email address when the email should have only gone to 
>> LRflex? The curious need to know.
>> :-)
>> Douglas
>>
>>
>> On 09/02/2022 19:24, Frank Filippone via LUG wrote:
>>> I take exception to the way this topic is going.... uppity.
>>>
>>> First, it is about Nature, and not Photo Journalism.?? Thus, 
>>> manipulation of the image is up to the Artist.? There is no right or 
>>> wrong.? Anything is fair, that passes the rules of the competition.? 
>>> Since it did indeed win, it must have passed the rules.
>>>
>>> Second, the image was granted a People?s Choice Award.? Which, to my 
>>> way of thinking, it is an award SELECTED by the general population, 
>>> not a judge. The concept of Taste, artistry, technical achievement, 
>>> etc has no standard.? It really also is not a concept that was the 
>>> basis for giving it an award.
>>>
>>> Third, the general talk that I hear is that the population in 
>>> general LIKES and favors "over saturated" images.? Same was true on 
>>> Pictorialism in the early 1900's.? It is a FASHION or TREND, not a 
>>> fact.? Certainly not a rule.
>>>
>>> Last:? it all about taste. Maybe not yours, maybe not mine, but, in 
>>> truth, someone had to vote it "Best" of the applicants. Someone 
>>> liked it, best.
>>>
>>> So let's not get too uppity.... it is one form of expression that 
>>> someone else liked....?? That is all it is.... And judging it, 
>>> outside the rules of the contest in which it was submitted, is 
>>> unfair to the artist, and, in my estimation, pretty petty.
>>>
>>> Let's all be a bit more lenient and less judgemental.
>>>
>>> my $0.02
>>>
>>> Frank Filippone
>>> BMWRed735i at gmail.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>



In reply to: Message from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] [LRflex] Re: Over-processed)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] [LRflex] Re: Over-processed)
Message from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] [LRflex] Re: Over-processed with a link)