Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2022/02/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] [LRflex] Re: Over-processed
From: imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 20:05:58 +0000
References: <202229103912.365706@DESKTOP-UR7CQAT> <c37ee5e1-806c-1c94-720a-b4dd4fb0518e@gmail.com>

Ermm, Frank, all very fascinating I'm sure. I know I've been busy, and 
may have overlooked the topic you are talking about, but I haven't seen 
anything on this topic on the LUG. Have you been over processing and 
included a process that should have been excluded - to whit the LUG 
email address when the email should have only gone to LRflex? The 
curious need to know.
:-)
Douglas


On 09/02/2022 19:24, Frank Filippone via LUG wrote:
> I take exception to the way this topic is going.... uppity.
>
> First, it is about Nature, and not Photo Journalism.?? Thus, 
> manipulation of the image is up to the Artist.? There is no right or 
> wrong.? Anything is fair, that passes the rules of the competition.? 
> Since it did indeed win, it must have passed the rules.
>
> Second, the image was granted a People?s Choice Award.? Which, to my 
> way of thinking, it is an award SELECTED by the general population, 
> not a judge. The concept of Taste, artistry, technical achievement, 
> etc has no standard.? It really also is not a concept that was the 
> basis for giving it an award.
>
> Third, the general talk that I hear is that the population in general 
> LIKES and favors "over saturated" images.? Same was true on 
> Pictorialism in the early 1900's.? It is a FASHION or TREND, not a 
> fact.? Certainly not a rule.
>
> Last:? it all about taste. Maybe not yours, maybe not mine, but, in 
> truth, someone had to vote it "Best" of the applicants. Someone liked 
> it, best.
>
> So let's not get too uppity.... it is one form of expression that 
> someone else liked....?? That is all it is.... And judging it, outside 
> the rules of the contest in which it was submitted, is unfair to the 
> artist, and, in my estimation, pretty petty.
>
> Let's all be a bit more lenient and less judgemental.
>
> my $0.02
>
> Frank Filippone
> BMWRed735i at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] [LRflex] Re: Over-processed with a link)
Reply from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] [LRflex] Re: Over-processed)
In reply to: Message from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] [LRflex] Re: Over-processed)