[Leica] My 6 pictures

[jassechan at gmail.com (Jasse Chan)]

Dear Lluis!

I love it when you share you pics!

I agree with you - the first one tells more of a story - although I can
tell why you're torn - the other one shows her expression more

jasse

On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 5:03?PM Lluis Ripoll via LUG <lug at leica-users.org>
wrote:

> Hi Peter,
>
> Thank you vry much for your comments, you have very well reported the
> signifiance of both images, In my opinion, both express the same thing, but
> they explain it differently. I think they complement each other, so I think
> it would be a good idea to show both.
>
> I agree with you about the look of over exposed images but I think that
> this is a defect of over developing, in Barcelona is very, very hot, my
> darkroom is at 27 or 28 ?C and this increase very fast the temperature of
> the developer, I have prepared the developer and started the process at
> 19?C, after 6 minutes developing time when I have poor the developer (I
> dalways do this to have a better information of the temperature) it was at
> 23?C, normally in winter the final temperature is 20 or 21?C. However I
> think that when I do the positive this will be corrected, the scanner
> increase the highlights than the paper sensitivity. I hope that in
> September I can work again in the darkroom.
>
> Cheers
> Lluis
>
>
>
> > El 14 ag 2025, a les 13:26, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com> va
> escriure:
> >
> > Lluis,
> >
> > It's up to the photographer in the end! :-)
> >
> > My personal preference is for the first; but it depends on what your
> subject is. If it's the whole scene, then definitely the first. If the
> image is of the girl - which is a nice portrait, although it makes her look
> like she's lost - then clearly the second.
> >
> > They are in effect two different subjects. The first sets her in
> context, the other is simply of her.
> >
> > What did you want to achieve?
> >
> > To me they all appear a bit over-exposed. Maybe it's my screen
> >
> > As ever, all the best,
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > On 13/08/2025 20:33, Lluis Ripoll via LUG wrote:
> >> The two first pictures are from the same placement, the only difference
> is the lens, the first one with a 28mm and the second one with the 50mm, I
> would appreciate your opinions about which one do you prefer, I like both,
> maybe with a preference for the first one, thank you.
> >> On the World
> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2025F080107.jpg.html
> >
> >> Leica MP, Elmarit 28 Asph., Tri-X E.I. 320, developed on T-Max
> >> On transit
> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2025F080106.jpg.html
> >
> >> Leica MP, Summilux 50 V2., Tri-X E.I. 320, developed on T-Max
> >> At the shadow
> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2025F080132.jpg.html
> >
> >> Leica MP, Tri-X E.I. 320, developed on T-Max
> >> Coffee Time
> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2025F080131.jpg.html
> >
> >> Leica MP, Summaron 35 2.8, Tri-X EI 320, T-Max
> >> At the end of the way
> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2025F080128.jpg.html
> >
> >> Leica MP, Summilux 50 V2, Tri-X EI 320, T-Max
> >> With care
> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2025F070402.jpg.html
> >
> >> Leica M3, Summicron Rigid, Ilford FP4 EI 100, HC-110 1:31
> >> Thanks for looking, your c&c are welcome
> >> Saludos cordiales.
> >> Lluis
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Peter Dzwig
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



-- 
Jasse Chan

jassechan at gmail.com