Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2025/08/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Peter, Thank you vry much for your comments, you have very well reported the signifiance of both images, In my opinion, both express the same thing, but they explain it differently. I think they complement each other, so I think it would be a good idea to show both. I agree with you about the look of over exposed images but I think that this is a defect of over developing, in Barcelona is very, very hot, my darkroom is at 27 or 28 ?C and this increase very fast the temperature of the developer, I have prepared the developer and started the process at 19?C, after 6 minutes developing time when I have poor the developer (I dalways do this to have a better information of the temperature) it was at 23?C, normally in winter the final temperature is 20 or 21?C. However I think that when I do the positive this will be corrected, the scanner increase the highlights than the paper sensitivity. I hope that in September I can work again in the darkroom. Cheers Lluis > El 14 ag 2025, a les 13:26, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com> va > escriure: > > Lluis, > > It's up to the photographer in the end! :-) > > My personal preference is for the first; but it depends on what your > subject is. If it's the whole scene, then definitely the first. If the > image is of the girl - which is a nice portrait, although it makes her > look like she's lost - then clearly the second. > > They are in effect two different subjects. The first sets her in context, > the other is simply of her. > > What did you want to achieve? > > To me they all appear a bit over-exposed. Maybe it's my screen > > As ever, all the best, > > Peter > > On 13/08/2025 20:33, Lluis Ripoll via LUG wrote: >> The two first pictures are from the same placement, the only difference >> is the lens, the first one with a 28mm and the second one with the 50mm, >> I would appreciate your opinions about which one do you prefer, I like >> both, maybe with a preference for the first one, thank you. >> On the World >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2025F080107.jpg.html> >> Leica MP, Elmarit 28 Asph., Tri-X E.I. 320, developed on T-Max >> On transit >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2025F080106.jpg.html> >> Leica MP, Summilux 50 V2., Tri-X E.I. 320, developed on T-Max >> At the shadow >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2025F080132.jpg.html> >> Leica MP, Tri-X E.I. 320, developed on T-Max >> Coffee Time >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2025F080131.jpg.html> >> Leica MP, Summaron 35 2.8, Tri-X EI 320, T-Max >> At the end of the way >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2025F080128.jpg.html> >> Leica MP, Summilux 50 V2, Tri-X EI 320, T-Max >> With care >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2025F070402.jpg.html> >> Leica M3, Summicron Rigid, Ilford FP4 EI 100, HC-110 1:31 >> Thanks for looking, your c&c are welcome >> Saludos cordiales. >> Lluis >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- > Dr. Peter Dzwig > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information