Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2022/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I bought a 70-210 Nikon f4/5.6D last month for $84. I looks brand new. See the head shots on this page for some images I made with it. http://krw.wesselphoto.com/political/lucas-kunce Sent from Mail for Windows From: Aram Langhans via LUG Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2022 9:08 AM To: Leica Reflex; LUG Cc: Aram Langhans Subject: [Leica] Lens opinion Since I? now have a mirrorless, it opens up a vast array of lenses that can be adapted to the body.? I rarely use anything over my 120mm range I have now, but was thinking of a 300mm. Since I don't use it often and it would be most likely for static objects, I am looking at a few vintage type 300mm lenses as they would be not much of an expenditure for the limited use they would get.? Weight is also a factor in whatever choice I make..? Pentax 300/4, Olympus? 300/4.5, a few varieties of Nikon are all brands that in my mind made some excellent glass and could be adapted easily.? I am wondering if the would be as good as the Nikon 70-200/4 at 200 + 1.4 extender I had owned.? I think I regret selling that combo, but with the needed Nikon full auto adapter it would have defeated my main goal of the Z7, weight reduction. These lenses lenses could get by with a very light totally manual Z adapter.? I bought one for F to Z to accommodate some of my F mount accessories like microscope adapter and bellows and it is pretty light. I welcome any opinions. Aram -- Aram Langhans (Semi) Retired Science Teacher & Unemployed photographer ?The Human Genome Project has proved Darwin more right than Darwin himself would ever have dared dream.? James D. Watson _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information