Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2020/09/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On the chance it was a one time glitch ( or maybe a few more than that) I am sending one of the messages again to the lUG...... If it fails, I will so as you ask.... On 9/16/2020 1:52 PM, Brian Reid wrote: > What URL are you enclosing? If you put spaces before and after each > dot in the name, it will not trigger the spam detector. > If it happens again please forward the entire rejection reply to me at > reid at mejac.carlsbad.ca.us > > The LUG uses a standard commercial spam and virus detector (Barracuda) > and I don't have a lot of fine control over what it does. I can > whitelist specific URLs, though. > > On 2020-09-15 10:33 am, Frank Filippone via LUG wrote: >> I thought it was a one time anomaly, but now any emails I send to the >> LUG, with an enclosed URL,? have been getting this reply: >> >> The response from the remote server was: >> >> 554 rejected due to spam URL in content >> >> >> I am using GMail from Thunderbird. >> >> Can you help tell me what I need to do to make this start working? >> >> Note: My emails are all sent in HTML.? Could this be the issue? ( I >> thought the LUG server took care of this...?) > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- *Frank Filippone* *BMWRed735i at Gmail.com*