Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]After six weeks with an M9, I think the answer is "No I don't think so".
I did think about keeping an M8 body for IR, but I don't do enough IR to
justify it.
I find the M9 is just better. Having the lenses used to their full
potential on a digital body is still a revelation.
Mark Pope,
Swindon, Wilts
UK
Homepage http://www.monomagic.co.uk
Blog http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog
Picture a week (2012) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2012
Picture a week (2010) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2010
Picture a week (2009) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009
(2008)
http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008
On 08/04/2012 16:07, Vick Ko wrote:
> Would you trade your M9 to go back to an M8?
>
> Factors:
> - M9 is still $5K to $6, and will start going down its devaluation curve
> - M8 is likely at the bottom of its devaluation curve, with mint units
> at $2.5K
> - M8 is still a darned fine camera, and I still have a whack of UV/IR
> filters
>
> Has anyone gone from M9 back to an M8? What were your reasons?
>
> Vick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information