Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Peter Klein writes in part:
>
> The Leica lens is visibly a little "better" from a technical point of
> view. But the CV lens is no slouch, is certainly sharp enough, and is a
> little kinder to the elderly. The Leica has more contrast and harsher
> bokeh. The CV has a bit of what Erwin would call veiling flare, which
> actually can lift shadows a bit, but may make shaded faces look a little
> muddy.
>
> What I really like about the 35/1.2 is that it combines and balances the
> excellent performance of modern aspheric lenses with some of the smoother,
> "rounder" drawing and smoother bokeh associated with classic lenses. I
> really like it. The only things I don't like about it are the size and
> weight, and the fact that it will color fringe in extreme contrast
> situations (backlit tree branches against the sky).
I agree with the above and that is why I kept the Summilux and sold the CV
35/1.2.
Greg Lorenzo
Calgary, Canada
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft?s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390706/direct/01/