Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat Dec 27 15:10:33 2008
 
Dear Mr. Distraction
    or Diffraction:

Get the 9000.

Mark William Rabiner



> From: Diffraction Photography <diffraction.ca@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:01:47 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm new to this list and don't mean to hijack this thread but it seems
> relevant to my current dilemma.  I'm considering the Nikon 5000ED and
> the 9000ED.   I shoot mostly 35mm but I also shoot 120 film so one
> would think the choice would be simple.  I've read a lot of reviews
> and comparisons and I have asked many opinions but I'm still stuck as
> I would only like to purchase 1 scanner, not 2.  Ultimately I am
> wondering about the experiences of people here with the
> inconveniences, quality and effienciency of scanning 35mm film w/ the
> 9000ED vs using the 5000ED.  I don't plan on buying the multi-roll
> feeder.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
 In reply to: Message from diffraction.ca at gmail.com (Diffraction Photography) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)