Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Joseph:
The 35/ 1.5 has good ratings but pricey. I wish you guys had listed the
25/ 3.5 to make me feel better--I just bought one!!!
Thanks for all the fine intell.
Bill
Joseph Low <joelct@singnet.com.sg> wrote:
Ken
Check out the Canon 35/1.5 LTM as well
Joseph / Singapore
-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org]On Behalf Of
Kenneth Frazier
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 2:34 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: LTM lenses
On Sep 9, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Mark Langer wrote:
> 'd rate the 35/2, the 100/3.5 and the 100/2 as great lenses.
Thanks, Mark, and others, for all the good input. Sounds like I ned
to look more closely at the Canons.
Ken
-----------------------------------
The Rev. Kenneth Frazier
Connecticut Conference, United Church of Christ
----------------------------------
Current Leica Photography (PESO):
http://gallery2.leica-users.org/v/kennybod/
Current Medium Format Photos:
http://tinyurl.com/bjvfn
Current Leica Photography (in move to new gallery)
http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
countries) for 2?/min or less.