Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: LTM lenses
From: joelct at singnet.com.sg (Joseph Low)
Date: Sat Sep 9 16:59:01 2006
 
            Ken

            Check out the Canon 35/1.5 LTM as well

            Joseph / Singapore

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org]On Behalf Of
Kenneth Frazier
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 2:34 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: LTM lenses


On Sep 9, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Mark Langer wrote:

> 'd rate the 35/2, the 100/3.5 and the 100/2 as great lenses.

Thanks, Mark, and others, for all the good input.  Sounds like I ned
to look more closely at the Canons.

Ken
-----------------------------------
The Rev. Kenneth Frazier
Connecticut Conference, United Church of Christ
----------------------------------
Current Leica Photography (PESO):
http://gallery2.leica-users.org/v/kennybod/

Current Medium Format Photos:
http://tinyurl.com/bjvfn

Current Leica Photography (in move to new gallery)
http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r




_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from wrs111445 at yahoo.com (Bill Smith) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)
 In reply to: Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)