Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jim - I used Gold 400 very happily for a long time before switching to Supra 400 at the recommendation of my photo processor. Supra is now hard to find and I've been playing around with Portra NC, VC and UC. NC is really pale - you saw the photo of the sycamores. VC is closest to Supra in my experience. UC is REALLY saturated. Kodak has changed its films so much lately I've lost track of what's available but I think I'll look at the 100 and 200 speed negative films that are around and give a couple a try. Thanks. . >Richard, > >After similar disappointments, I settled on Kodak Gold 200, and it has >served me well. There should be a similar Professional Version rated at >200, but I have not really pursued that route yet. > >Jim Nichols >nicholsj@edge.net > > >> [Original Message] >> From: Richard S. Taylor <r.s.taylor@comcast.net> >> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >> Date: 12/6/2004 1:04:35 PM >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Bad Exposure or Something Else? >> >> John - Your "sinful" attempt to correct the image is certainly closer > > to what I saw - and thanks you and to all the others who responded >(snip) >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Regards, Dick Boston MA