Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Lux Q
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Tue Oct 12 10:22:52 2004
References: <BD91ABB0.875B%philippe.orlent@pandora.be>
 
>Well,
>
>The "no pixels" bug (at least not all the time) finally got me. I must have
>been hanging around here too much...
>So, my CL got a bigger brother,  a M4-2 in good shape, and now I'm thinking
>of buying a 50 Summilux for it. No Summicron, no Noctilux, sorry.
>
>Should I go for the 1st version or the last one of this beauty?
>
>Every pro and con is warmly welcomed.
>
>Merci,
>Philippe
>
>P.S. In my mind M1's till M3's are feminin, from the M4 on they changed
>sexes :-)

With respect to the Summilux, get the later one with the built in 
hood; not because of the hood, which is stupid, but because it 
focusses down to .7m.

P.S. How you deal with your cameras sexually is _completely_ up to 
you, and you needn't keep us informed. :-)

-- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Lux Q)