Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Konica fiction - a term definition
From: "Charles Cason" <cec@vbe.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 16:33:24 -0500

You are trying to read and reason at the same time.  The
differential is too great on the LUG

____________________________
The Rev'd Charles E Cason Jr
St. Peter's Episcopal Church (Ripon WI)
1805 Arlington Drive
Oshkosh, WI  54904
(920) 231-8851
Mailto:cec@vbe.com


- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of
Victor Wek
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:53 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: [Leica] Re: Konica fiction - a term definition



I probably do not understand current “Konica fiction”
discussion, because of
mix terms used. What is “image quality”?
If we all agree that photography is a form of art , image
quality is
immeasurable. We can discuss film quality, lens quality,
paper quality, when
we agree what we will measure to define that. But image
quality, how
technically we can measure image (painting?) quality of Van
Gogh or Rafael
art?
For certain effect older Leica lenses can be better then
newer (i.e. bokeh).
And I can understand DR Summicron has better “image quality”
then the newest
one, if I look for particular visual effect the newer lenses
lack.

I am confused,
Victor
Earth, Solar System

____________________________________________________________
_____________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.