Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2025/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have the 16-50mm which is better than the 18-55, but sometimes when I need longer reach, the Leica 90 is just the ticket. Plus, it works on my M2. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman photo at frozenlight.eu http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.frozenlight.eu @nwajsman.bsky.social ????? ???????! ?????? ?????! > On 8 Apr 2025, at 22:48, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com> wrote: > > Nathan, > > what about the 18-55mm XF f2.8-4 which can cover most useful distances?It > is not the lightest, but it is very useful. > > Peter > > On 05/04/2025 15:11, Nathan Wajsman via LUG wrote: >> I know it is not Friday, but I believe that WTB ads are allowed at any >> time. >> As some of you know, my backpack was stolen in Lisbon in late January. >> Among other things, it held my Fuji X-E3 and several lenses. I have not >> needed to replace most of this equipment because I had another X-E3 body >> at home, and also some similar lenses. But the one lens I really regret >> losing is the 90mm Tele-Elmarit which always has served me well as the >> lens to take when travelling light. The Fuji 90mm is one stop faster and >> AF but it is also 3 times as big and heave as the Leica. >> So I am looking to replace the 90mm Tele-Elmarit. If anyone has one that >> is surplus to requirements, please contact me privately. >> Cheers, >> Nathan >> Nathan Wajsman >> photo at frozenlight.eu >> http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws >> http://www.greatpix.eu >> http://www.frozenlight.eu >> @nwajsman.bsky.social >> ????? ???????! ?????? ?????! >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- > > Dr. Peter Dzwig > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information