Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2025/04/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Interesting images, Alan, but I think the focus or aperture is slightly different in both cases as the pillar/column in the Sinar shows more detail and Julian's face seems a little more defined in the Nikkor one. That said, age has gifted me an immature cataract, so who am I to judge. Someone more hawk-eyed on the list might have a different opinion. Good stucco can be a wonderful thing and over here we have a lot of "great" houses which have really splendid examples of it at its best. However, without a string of agile servants armed with ready dusters, it is a difficult to keep clean. I'm glad I moved from our 1850s Victorian place to a smaller and less fussy bungalow with lower ceilings. Douglas On 06/04/2025 03:04, Alan Magayne-Roshak via LUG wrote: > I'm still organizing and editing my archive of photos from 1961 to the > present, and I thought these two treatments of an assignment in 1982 were > interesting together. Julian Orlandini was a master of plasterwork, and > his studio furnished items for many restored buildings in Milwaukee. > > < > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/Lessons/Julian+Orlandini+x+2.jpg.html > The left hand picture was done with a Sinar 4x5, 150mm lens, and two #5 > flashbulbs on Plus-X. The right shot was taken with my M3 and > 35mm f/1.8 Nikkor LTM lens on Tri-X. > > Can be viewed large. > > (Nathan - in 1967, before I ever met him, I took a picture of his > motorcycle outside his studio: an Ariel Square-Four. > < > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/Motorcycles/19670713_MR_Ariel_20.jpg.html >> ) >