Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2024/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Review article of two Light Lens Lab prototype lenses
From: john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster)
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 21:56:07 +0000
References: <d2120601-b6fa-4538-907b-a7755874603c@iol.ie> <D9395AAC-19C1-4F8C-B84C-19EAAC81AD0F@teleport.com> <99A12659-4B55-4E77-A33C-AEA97B173AAD@mac.com>
 
https://tinyurl.com/rclompus

john



    I just published an article in PetaPixel about my experience with two 
prototype lenses from Light Lens Lab. I use many Leica lenses but I'm always 
on the lookout for something different and affordable.  There are a growing 
list of M mount lenses made by new companies - some that are very good and 
some that are not so good.  I have found LLL?s remakes of historical lenses 
an interesting business model. I often use Leica?s remake of the 28/5.6 
silver Summaron lens that is a joy to use.  

    I hope you enjoy reading this article as much as I enjoyed reviewing and 
writing it.

    
https://petapixel.com/2024/03/05/light-lens-lab-1966-50mm-f-1-2-and-spii-50mm-f-2-review-rare-lenses-recreated/?
    Light Lens Lab 1966 50mm f/1.2 and SPII 50mm f/2 Review: Rare Lenses 
Recreated
    petapixel.com


    Be well,
    Richard

    Richard Clompus
    Virginia, USA
Replies: Reply from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Review article of two Light Lens Lab prototype lenses)
 In reply to: Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] Faux Leica)
Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] Q vs M unloved ancient only 24mp M240 (et al MP 262 etc))
Message from rclompus at mac.com (Richard Clompus) ([Leica] Review article of two Light Lens Lab prototype lenses)