Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2022/08/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Medium Format Rolleiflex vs Super Ikonta III
From: lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:33:39 +0200
References: <E9B928A4-0C88-463C-B0BF-35F803C38917@gmail.com> <CA+3n+_nKkD9pVPyveALK6my6Q=gn3KW9mgh40R7DMhP65xevWQ@mail.gmail.com>

Don,

Thank you very much for your kind words! 

It is true, the preparation on a camera like the Rolleiflex is slower than 
with an M, that is why I bought the Super Ikonta which is a rangefinder 
camera faster to use, but it does not have the quality of the Rolleiflex, in 
medium format 6x6 there is not much choice of rangefinder cameras, only 
Mamiya, Plaubel , Fuji that I remember, but these are quite more expensive 
cameras.

Regarding the images, I prefer the quality of the Rolleiflex, I find the 
Ikonta ones very soft.

Thank you very much again!
Lluis


> El 31 ag 2022, a les 1:13, Don Dory via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> va 
> escriure:
> 
> I actually prefer the Ikonta roots image; I like the imperfections compared
> to the Rollei.   Some days I fall into an older vision.
> 
> Your medium format images are impressive in the slightly increased
> composition thought: probably due to slightly slower controls compared to
> an M.
> 
> Then there is the tonality of medium format and FP4.  Ilford was always
> more of a stretch in the US compared to Plus X.
> 
> It is a pleasure to see your images.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022, 5:34 PM Lluis Ripoll via LUG <lug at leica-users.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> I have compared photographs from two 6x6 cameras Rolleiflex with a Planar
>> 80mm f 2.8 and Zeiss Super Ikonta III 531/16 with a Tessar 75mm f 3.5. In
>> both I have used the same Ilford FP4 E.I. 100 film, both films have been
>> developed together in the same tank. The photo that best shows the
>> different performance is in Roots. Anyway the Zeiss Super Ikonta requires 
>> a
>> calibration of the rangefinder, today I have taken it to the seller's
>> workshop to adjust it.
>> 
>> In the Cofee Shop
>> <
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Medium+Format/2022F080412.jpg.html
>>> 
>> Rolleiflex E, Zeiss Planar 80mm f 2.8, Ilford FP4, D-23 1:1
>> 
>> Light geometry
>> <
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Medium+Format/2022F080411.jpg.html
>>> 
>> Rolleiflex E, Zeiss Planar 80mm f 2.8, Ilford FP4, D-23 1:1
>> 
>> Roots
>> <
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Medium+Format/2022F080505.jpg.html
>>> 
>> Zeiss Super Ikonta III 531/16, Ilford FP4, D-23 1:1
>> 
>> Roots bis
>> <
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Medium+Format/2022F080402.jpg.html
>>> 
>> Rolleiflex E, Zeiss Planar 80mm f 2.8, Ilford FP4, D-23 1:1
>> 
>> Resting on the shadows
>> <
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Medium+Format/2022F080509.jpg.html
>>> 
>> Zeiss Super Ikonta III 531/16, Ilford FP4, D-23 1:1
>> 
>> Resting on the Park
>> <
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Medium+Format/2022F080504.jpg.html
>>> 
>> Zeiss Super Ikonta III 531/16, Ilford FP4, D-23 1:1
>> 
>> Thanks for looking, your c&c are wecome
>> 
>> Saludos cordiales
>> Lluis
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: Medium Format Rolleiflex vs Super Ikonta III)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Medium Format Rolleiflex vs Super Ikonta III)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Medium Format Rolleiflex vs Super Ikonta III)