Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2021/05/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I like both ?no title? very much. And the old lens certainly does well! Un abrazo, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA "I?m not arguing, I?m just explaining why I?m right" > On 13 May 2021, at 13:23, Lluis Ripoll via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> > wrote: > > These are the last ones I?ll share with the Leica II, film was Kentmere > 100. The two las was to test the lens (Elmar f 3.5 5cm) in backlight > without lenshood > > No title 1 > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2021F050110.jpg.html> > > No Title 2 > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2021F050114.jpg.html> > > Wall (This one was wide open and focus on the flowers) > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2021F050117.jpg.html> > > Testing a strong backlight from the shadow side without lenshood > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2021F050126.jpg.html> > > Testing backlight from the shadow side (more protected) without lenshood > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/2021F050127.jpg.html> > > Thanks for looking, your c&c are welcome > > Saludos cordiales > Lluis > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information