Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2020/06/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I like the second one best; it is a tighter composition, and the boy?s face mask is more visible. Un abrazo, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA "I?m not arguing, I?m just explaining why I?m right" > On 17 Jun 2020, at 01:48, Lluis Ripoll via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> > wrote: > > Some days ago I?ve posted this picture, I thought it described well the > confinement concept. I?ve received some comments about to burn a little > the boy on the foreground to be better separated from the background, I > have to do it. > > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Confinement/2020F060224.jpg.html> > > Editing my scans I?ve found this other picture that describes the same > concept > > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Confinement/2020F060223.jpg.html> > > I would appreciate your opinions about which one would you choose of both, > despite the lack of the burning on the first one I think the first one is > better. Thank you! > > Saludos cordiales > Lluis > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information