[Leica] Sony 55 Sonnar question

[mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)]

But if a fixed lens was flexible it would NOT be doing its job!
A very good joke ruined!
Otherwise good work Mark!
 
 

-- 

Mark William Rabiner
Photographer

?On 10/23/18, 2:33 AM, "LUG on behalf of Mark Rabiner" 
<lug-bounces+mark=rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of mark at 
rabinergroup.com> wrote:

    I agree on fixed focal length glass as lacking flexibility. But if a 
fixed lens was flexible it would be doing its job!
    If this was me shooting with one lens with a Sony I'd shoot it with a 
Vario-Tessar T* FE 24-70 mm F4 ZA OSS which is gorgeous and takes licking 
and keeps on ticking I'd not leave home without and I'm not really kidding.!
    When I look at the focal lengths I shoot with my new zooms this year I'd 
never have thought those focal lengths were what I'd be using in these 
situations.
    It's always what you don?t think. So a zoom has you not locked in and 
has you covered.
    So if you're not walking around with a camera bag with a complete set of 
wide, normal, tele lenses I'd for sure have a standard zoom on that anti 
vibration camera.
    And in this case what could be more perfect than an F4 fixed zoom?
    It?s the glass which is way we should be buying our cameras. And this 
glass for this system seems very exciting.
    I?m using Nikon VR zooms for the most part it's not all that original 
but I'm excited by it.
    I?m getting a 50-200 VR DX as I'm getting a D500 fast DX camera body for 
my birthday in a few weeks. 
    Ten frames a second and be there.
    VR means Vibration Reduction.
    
    My favorite lens now is my AF-S VR 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED  for my D750 I 
just got I use it way more than my wide or tele zooms.
    I'll soon be using it on my DX D500 which makes it a 35-125mm which I 
may like better and is what I used for my road trip moving here from the 
west to east coast.
    
    
    
    
    
    Vario-Tessar T* FE 24-70 mm F4 ZA OSS
    SEL2470Z
    
     
     
    
    -- 
    
    Mark William Rabiner
    Photographer
    
    ?On 10/23/18, 2:07 AM, "LUG on behalf of Philippe via LUG" 
<lug-bounces+mark=rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of lug at 
leica-users.org> wrote:
    
        Hi Douglas,
        
        what I question is not the lens itself whatever the brand, but its 
FL and the lack of versatility a fixed lens provides.
        
        Well, you know the details more than I do after all.
        
        Good luck with the shooting
         
        Amities
        
        Philippe
        
        
        
        > Le 22 oct. 2018 ? 23:42, Douglas Barry <imra at iol.ie> a ?crit :
        > 
        > I've an assignment which involves a day's shooting in an office 
environment with my Sony A7ll, and will need to use flash more than a bit. 
I'm not overly thrilled with the kit lens that came with the Sony, so am 
thinking of going for 55mm 1.8 Sonnar as it is designed for the camera and 
flash. I have a perfectly good Elmar 50 2.8, but it won't give me the 
response times I will need for this task.
        > 
        > So the question for the Sony shooters out there is, have you got 
this lens, and are you happy with it? Of course, I have looked at reviews, 
but it's good to hear real world experiences.
        > 
        > Douglas
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > _______________________________________________
        > Leica Users Group.
        > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more 
information
        
        
        _______________________________________________
        Leica Users Group.
        See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Leica Users Group.
    See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information