Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/05/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] More with the Rolleiflex
From: leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans)
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 15:13:58 -0700
References: <70a8545c-76d4-424b-a9de-9560c78f040f@gmail.com> <002701d3e238$32e23d90$98a6b8b0$@ca> <mwhpr10mb16462a6533b384e590cb4a09b8810@mwhpr10mb1646.namprd10.prod.outlook.com> <eafb0df5-e87e-49b0-b0f2-9b55c0478bf5@rabinergroup.com> <0E44A3B84EC.00000A08baroque-2@inbox.com>

All this tripping down memory lane and I think I need to dig out my 
Rollei 3.5F and find a roll or two of film.? I might just have a few in 
the freezer from way back.? Might even still be good. Maybe even the 
shutter will work accurately.

Aram


On 5/3/2018 11:54 AM, Les Myers wrote:
> My introduction to my Rollei was through the editor of a news bureau in 
> Washington DC. He was rough on film, and said 35mm couldn't take the 
> abuse. I watched him develope, in deep tanks, several rolls I shot for an 
> assignment by him. Once the film was developing, he'd puff on his cigar- 
> in the dark - until the film was finished. Then he'd select the images he 
> would print for the Washington Evening Star or other clients for whom I 
> was shooting (embassies, State Department, etc.) I learned a lot about 
> posing ("none of that grip 'n grin stuff, please") and "waiting for the 
> moment." I replaced that old Rollei with a newer one in the 1970's. It 
> sits near me, loaded and ready.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>> Sent: Wed, 02 May 2018 19:34:02 -0700
>> To: lug at leica-users.org
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] More with the Rolleiflex
>>
>> I shot weddings when I was younger. I've done maybe 50.
>> I always used a Rollei 3.5 loaded with Verichrome Pan 120.
>> I carried a Leica IIIf as a backup but never needed it at a real
>> wedding.
>>
>> 120 film meant I didn't need a telephoto because I could do it in the
>> enlarger.
>> I always managed to find a way to shoot the whole-family shots without
>> needing a wide angle.
>>
>> I borrowed a Rollei modified for 220 once. And the developing spools for
>> it. You should try loading 8 rolls of 220 into 8 24-exposure Nikkor
>> spools on a deadline. I got pretty good at loading 120, but 220 remained
>> a high-stress challenge. There was also the problem of hanging up 220
>> film to dry. It was close to 2 meters long. 120 remained a good
>> compromise.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>



Replies: Reply from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] More with the Rolleiflex)
Reply from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] More with the Rolleiflex)
In reply to: Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] More with the Rolleiflex)
Message from baroque-2 at inbox.com (Les Myers) ([Leica] More with the Rolleiflex)