Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4
From: gerry.walden at me.com (Gerry Walden)
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:19:04 +0100
References: <CA+yJO1AGswfTQWGBhAZgY+EfddjcLsC+q-qmtntYhji=TMZ4FA@mail.gmail.com> <CC92DFED.245D3%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CABmfTOVVExvN+wL67GAm6G8bnOd_1f6-oXNsO8tuEuML=ag8Ww@mail.gmail.com>

Do you know, I may be talking total Leica heresy here but I really don't see 
the point of the Monochrom. It seems to me that any .dng image from it is 
going to need as much post-processing as a 'normal' colour .dng from (say) 
the M9 converted to monochrome.

OK, they are now coming to put on the funny jacket and take me to a 'place 
of safety' for my own good.

Gerry

Gerry Walden
+44 (0)23 8046 3076 or
+44 (0)797 287 7932
www.gwpics.com

On 4 Oct 2012, at 11:47, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> wrote:

> That, to me, looks like an MM shot taken as a DNG and converted in
> Lightroom or PS without any manipulation.  If you shoot .jpgs in the
> camera they come out looking quite different to this.
> 
> Marty
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
> wrote:
>> How did you manage to neutralize all your cameras settings?
>> As I know when you shoot a jpeg there are all kinds of settings.
>> And it looks like what you've got set here is ultra low contrast.
>> Not sure what see can tell by seeing such an image.
>> I'd do your normal routine with it. Show us that.
>> 
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photography
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:14:33 -0400
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4
>>> 
>>> Because this is what they look like straight out of the camera:
>>> 
>>> http://www.pbase.com/image/146449509
>>> 
>>> Too flat for me but necessary if you are going to have all of the tones
>>> there to do what you want with them.  Silver Efex software comes with the
>>> MM. I like the effects of Silver Efex and also Exposure 3 which I already
>>> had.
>>> 
>>> Tina
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Robert Baron <robertbaron1 at 
>>> gmail.com>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I may have missed something or am confused (more likely): Do you run 
>>>> the MM
>>>> images through Silver Efex Pro?  If so, why?
>>>> 
>>>> --Bob
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> --
>>> Tina Manley, ASMP
>>> www.tinamanley.com
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)