Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 11:49:41 -0500 (CDT)
References: <CD0D8CAF-3810-4115-9FCA-B2121B7C30B2@mac.com>

Tina, 

Did you use one of the film emulations in using SFP2 to convert the M9 image?

Robert

On Oct 3, 2012, at 10:43 AM, robert.rose at mac.com wrote:

> 
> They both look like B&W.  Continuing our last discussion (:-) the M9 image 
> looks like it was shot with T-Max 100 and the MM looks like Tri-X.  
> 
> I never liked T-Max.
> 
> Bob
> 
> From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net>
> Subject: [Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4
> Date: October 3, 2012 4:18:56 AM PDT
> To: MUGers at yahoogroups.com, lug <lug at leica-users.org>, paw <paw at 
> micapeak.com>, seephoto <seephoto at micapeak.com>, Olympus Camera 
> Discussion <olympus at thomasclausen.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> 
> 
> PESO:
> 
> Several asked to see the M9 photo converted to B&W to compare with the MM
> one.
> 
> http://www.pbase.com/image/146447879
> 
> Using exactly the same settings in Silver Efex Pro that I used for the MM
> one.
> 
> . . . .
> 
> Opinions greatly appreciated.
> 
> Tina
> 
> -- 
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)
In reply to: Message from robert.rose at mac.com (robert.rose at mac.com) ([Leica] IMG: Converted M9 and 75/1.4)