Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Rabs, very perceptive commentary. Do you believe that technically the printable quality now obtainable through this sort of "trickery", whether by chip or film, is as good as that obtainable with large format? Paul obviously does. But, do you? Do others? Peter On 07/09/2012 22:26, Mark Rabiner wrote: > It does seem audacious or even impudent for a respected worker to be out in > Ansel Adams territory with a 35mm camera. ... Ansel A. would climb these > mountains before modern mountain climbing methods and been invented yet > with > an 8x10 camera on his back and a half dozen 8x10 glass plates in his early > 20's. ... > > But what Ansel didn't have and we have now is the ability to merge > individual exposures together and with each one we've in effect increased > our format size by that much. ... > So we have a decisive new paradigm shift now in how we might obtain images > with an astounding amount of breath taking information . > The word "coverage" can be used in a whole new way in photography. > Very large format results possible with very small formats. > We could go out with even smaller cropped digital sensors and work > spontaneously and then with carful stitching made large format results. And > I think here on the lug we've seen some from pocket point and shots with > sensors the size of your baby fingernail. ... -- =========================================================== Dr Peter Dzwig