Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Attending the MOMA massive HCB retrospective, I was struck by two things - besides HCB's unarguable amazing talent: First was how flat-out lousy most of the early prints are. Flat, gray, just plain bad. And second is how many of the images were 'good,' but wouldn't be in the MOMA or anywhere else if they hadn't been made by HCB. Many were, of course, sublime. But many others could easily have been made by any number of solid pre-and-post-war photographers. Which is not to say they were bad, but that they sure weren't great. Typed with big fingers on tiny keys -----Original Message----- From: "Bill Lawlor" <wvl at comcast.net> Sender: lug-bounces+bd=bdcolenphoto.com at leica-users.org Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:41:30 To: <lug at leica-users.org> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> Subject: [Leica] Leica Gallery and the Puddle Jumper FWIW In the Spring of 1999 I attended a gallery show of HCB prints, The Europeans, at Louisiana, near Copenhagen. A talk was given (in English) by some academic expert on HCB. He discussed the Puddle Jumper at some length and put up a slide of "the negative". I was struck by the fact that the negative was only perforated on one side and asked the speaker about it. He said it was a copy negative which I took to mean a copy of the original negative. This discussion suggests to me that might have been a copy of a print. BTW, I was surprised to see that a number of the pre-WWII prints were out of focus. Bill Lawlor _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information