Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Thanks for your comment, Jim. My impression is that film handles harsh
contrast and depth of colour slightly better. My M8 does a marvelous job
with colour, no doubt, and specifically when light is fading, but I have a
hard time getting the same blues and reds and yellows the (very) ancient
IIIC and lens provide! But this is a very partial point of view, I
know.Jean-Michel
> From: jshulman at judgecrater.com
> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:16:27 -0400
> To: lug at leica-users.org
> Subject: Re: [Leica] film again!!
>
> The camera in your hand puts no camera to shame.
>
> Jim Shulman
> Wynnewood, PA
> Who still, kicking and screaming, shoots film. Except when he doesn't.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf
> Of
> Jean-Michel Mertz
> Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 9:12 AM
> To: lug LEICA USERS ORGANISATION; image store lug group
> Subject: [Leica] film again!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I've just posted a series on Venice - film, leica IIIc (1946), Elmar 35 -
> 3,5 (1938) ... Well, I was wondering whether film did not, sometimes,
> depending on available light, time of day, etc. put digital to shame ... ?
> Thanks for your comments (the pics are classic postcards of a place
> everyone has photographed hundreds of times!).
> Jean-Michel
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Jean-Michel/VENISE/F1000031.jpg.html>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information