Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMGs: Too much? or Not enough?
From: montoid at earthlink.net (Montie Talbert)
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:48:15 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
 
Gravitating toward the one with less detail (second one).
I'll figure out why later after coffee  :-)

Montie

>>I like both versions, though I think I'm leaning towards the second, 
which seems more natural.  I wonder whether there's a middle ground - a 
sort of "Goldilocks" version, which has some, but not all of the punch 
of the top image, which may be the best of both worlds.




Mark Pope,
Swindon, Wilts
UK

Homepage               http://www.monomagic.co.uk
Blog                   http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog
Picture a week (2010)  http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2010
Picture a week (2009)  http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009
                (2008) 
http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008

On 22/01/2011 00:48, George Lottermoser wrote:
> <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=4755>
>
> c&c always welcome
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMGs: Too much? or Not enough?)