Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In the late 50's I used a Yashica 44LM, which used 127 film and
produced super slides. I still have a square 127 format mask for my
Focomat IIc.
My dad had a couple of Robots in the late 40's and early 50's with 3
or 4 lenses. Nice but quirky cameras, with a density that has to be
felt to be believed. I can't think of any camera that was built more
sturdily. I also still have the Robot format mask for the Focomat,
and a quite a few sheets of negatives from that time.
Tom Abrahamsson picked up a Robot Royal 36 a couple of years ago.
That one produces 24x36 negs, but is built similarly. It has a an
interrupted thread bayonet which would be strong enough to tow a
locomotive with.
>There was also a format called "Super Slides" which was I think about 40mm
>square but in a 35mm size mount. I remember my dad mounting them by hand
>from Rollei transparencies. I know that they vignette in my Leica
>projector! See I got something on-topic in there.
> Cheers
>Geoff
>http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>
>
>On 24 December 2010 04:59, Harrison McClary <lists at mcclary.net> wrote:
>
>> What kind of camera shot a square negative about 1 inch square?
>>
>> I am copying old slides my dad shot through out the years. I keep
>> running
>> across boxes of slides, same 2x2 mounts as 35mm slides, but they are
>> square.
>> The processing on the last box I copied was from 1971.
>>
>> And ideas on the kind of camera that shot small squares?
>>
>> Just curious as to what it was.
>>
>> Harrison
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
--
Henning J. Wulff
Wulff Photography & Design
mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
http://www.archiphoto.com