Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nikon is the one company that reversed the otherwise accepted
nomenclature and definitions for 'macro' and 'micro'. They called
their lenses that went from infinity to 1:1 or less 'micro', and 1:1
and higher magnification lenses 'macro' whereas the generally
accepted usage was the reverse.
At 3:11 PM -0400 10/27/10, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>In these cases they really are micro not macro lenses it seems to me.
>
>
>--------------------
>Mark William Rabiner
>Photography
>http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>mark at rabinergroup.com
>Cars: http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
>
>
>
>
>> From: Fred Hess <fredhess at phenix-visuals.nl>
>> Organization: Phenix Visuals NL
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:37:54 +0200
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] for nikon and/or macro enthusiasts
>>
>> More or less the same as the Leitz Photar range. I work with these
>> Photar-
>> lenses on my R-bellows and on my microscopes. These lenses have
>> RMS-thread.
>> Leitz made also a special set for the larger Aristophot-bellows with 40mm
>> thread.. There was also a set of Milar-lenses for macro-photography.
>> Great stuff for specialists!
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Fred
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com