Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes LR works on .tif files, as does CS#.
You can't edit with Camera Raw if it isn't a Raw file. You can certainly do
non-destructive edits on a .tif file (using LR or CS# layers), but my
understanding is that a .tif file is created by software interpreting the
sensor output (either scan or camera). A Raw file is simply the sensor
output without any software interpretation (other than the obvious firmware
interpreting the RGB value to give photon strengths received).
So the advantage, IMO of saving a raw file from a scan is the same as saving
it from a camera instead of the .tif file. All manipulation is up to the
owner, not the software.
But I'm no engineer and am probably barking up the wrong tree. Perhaps
others would know and I would be very interested in hearing thoughts.
Best,
Bob
Bob Adler
Palo Alto, CA
http://www.rgaphoto.com
________________________________
From: Tim Gray <tgray at 125px.com>
To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Wed, April 28, 2010 4:23:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: HELP Nikon scanner neophyte
On Apr 28, 2010 at 02:54 PM -0700, Bob Adler wrote:
> Don't forget that Vuescan can scan to a .dng RAW file that can be color
> corrected if needed (for Kodachrome/color scans). For BW, the .dng file
> needs to be "reversed" in CS4.
Doesn't LR work on tiffs too? I know Camera Raw does. I see no advantage
to saving scans as DNG. Edits made in Camera Raw are even written
non-destructively in the tiff if I recall.
Unlike raw files from cameras, scanned files are already full RGB data, so
they aren't raw in the same sense.
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information