Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In general I would agree with you, but IS can also be quite good with
moving subjects as most subjects have moments when action peaks or
there is a momentary pause. I've found that very often those are also
the moments that I like to capture, due to expressions or other
compositional concerns. Sometimes a shot at 1/125 at f/1.4 might be
better handled by an f/4 lens with IS at 1/15, even when the subject
is generally moving. A higher shutter speed can cover some errors in
handling; dof can cover others. Fast lenses and IS both have their
advantages, and not always with moving/stationary subjects. Different
technique is required, but both can often be effectively used with
either type of subject, in my experience.
BTW, I find that the IS on most current lenses gives you an advantage
of about 3 stops for a similar blur level, with the best system
giving you about 4 stops. Again, technique is important and you have
to practice a while.
At 5:45 AM +0200 4/14/10, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>If the subject is moving, no amount of IS will help. That is why I
>am generally an IS sceptic, since I tend to photograph people and
>not statues.
>
>Nathan
>
>Nathan Wajsman
>Alicante, Spain
>http://www.frozenlight.eu
>http://www.greatpix.eu
>http://www.nathanfoto.com
>
>Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Apr 14, 2010, at 3:28 AM, Vince Passaro wrote:
>
>>
>> I keep thinking that the 14-45 is slow, which nominally it is, but then
>> again I always have to remind myself that unlike the MF lenses I enjoy
>> using
>> with the G1, the Lumix 14-45 has IS so can be hand held at much longer
>> shutter speeds -- my guess is it compensates a step-and-a-half at least,
>> which means it's more like an f2 - f3.5 spread in terms of the light
>> conditions it can handle than the nominal 3.5-5.6. Any opinions on that?
>>
>> Vince
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com