Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I can't fault that logic at all :-)
One thing I don't understand is why in our local branch of Boots the
Chemist, pregnancy test kits are right next to the condoms. Doesn't
inspire much confidence...:-)
Cheers
Mark
Mark Pope,
Swindon, Wilts
UK
Homepage http://www.monomagic.co.uk
Blog http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog
Picture a week (2010) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2010
Picture a week (2009) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009
(2008)
http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008
Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> Well no, it makes perfect sense: if you use the first two products
> diligently, you will have an attractive smile and thus be more likely to
> score, in which case you will need the third group of products.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>
> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Roger Rubin wrote:
>
>> Hi All:
>> Product placement- local drug store...what were they thinking? Or what was
>> I thinking?
>>
>> http://v-images.smugmug.com/Other/LEICAMIX/11158095_n4hK2#782092168_n2W4W-L-LB
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information