Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark, I'm lucky enough right now to have both, and I'll keep both. I
got both for a fair bit less than the 75/2 costs new. They are
different enough and have enough different strengths that it makes it
worthwhile to keep both.
The Summilux design may be older and heavier but all I can suggest is
that you compare them yourself instead of making such comparisons off
the cuff. It's like saying the 100/3.5 Zeiss for Hasselblad is so
much better than the 150/4 that you might as well throw the 150 away.
:-) In my experience the two 75's are closer in performance than the
100 and 150 Zeiss lenses.
>Never in a million years would I want the 1.4 over the Leica Telephoto 75mm
>f/2.0 APO Summicron M Aspherical Manual Focus Lens (6-Bit, Updated for
>Digital) and get cutting edge compact modern Leica performance to knock out
>Canon and Nikon results.
>Sorry to rub owners of the Summilux the wrong way but it seems to me
>quaint, dated and overblown, front heavy and bloated, too heavy, old.
>A result of the speed wars of the 60's and 70's see Erwin's thing on the
>75mm focal lengh:
>http://www.imx.nl/photo/leica/lenses/lenses/page82.html
>
>
>Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com