Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Indeed. And the fact that Canon went to a cropped format is a major
disappointment to me! But my wife is?happy; no new camera!
:-)
Bob
?Bob Adler
Palo Alto, CA
http://www.raflexions.com
________________________________
From: Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu>
To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 11:03:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] iso 100.000+??
I want both, Tina. And the fact that Leica did not improve on this
particular aspect of performance when launching the M9 is a major
disappointment to me.
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
On Oct 22, 2009, at 3:02 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
> mehrdad wrote:
>> i know with the m8 & m9 we are struggling with iso 1250, i guess when m12
>> is
>> out leica will catch up with todays canon
>>
>>
> But we don't need 1250 with our fast Leica lenses.? Would you rather have
> 1250 iso and crappy lenses or 160 iso and fantastic lenses?? I'd rather
> have the fantastic fast lenses.
>
> Tina
> www.tinamanley.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information