Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 4:30 PM +0100 9/24/09, Neil Beddoe wrote:
>Somebody asked me once whether anyone would print black and white if
>colour photography had been invented first. I don't know but I
>think it would be a lot less common.
>
Exactly. B&W in general (and this is a generalization) relates to
nostalgia and what we liked in older photographs and the fact that
until quite recently B&W photography was much cheaper, much easier
and more archival.
Just think of the photos we would prefer if photography when first
invented would have been able to produce excellent chroma but uneven
or even lacking luminance information. I realize this is somewhat far
fetched, but our preference, especially among older practitioners to
prefer our initial step further into abstraction (all photography
already being an abstraction) to remove colour information from phots
is almost certainly due to the historical technical development.
Looking at painting/drawing, we see that B&W has been a parallel
development often due to certain materials, but abstractions have
taken all sorts of forms; again, due to technology/technique certain
types of abstractions have received more attention than others but in
general B&W has not been a major path like it has in photography.
All that, and I realize my traditional, home darkroom printing side
can relate to the B&W picture better, but the colour pallette in
particular is such that in the end I think the colour picture is the
better one.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com