Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Obviously debased standards
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:17:49 -0400
References: <001201ca3be2$2d464cb0$87d2e610$@net>
 
well deserved

as would all the other images in Pennsylvanians

i love it

ric




On Sep 22, 2009, at 8:09 PM, Jim Shulman wrote:

> Even the LHSA's "Viewfinder" must be scraping the bottom of the  
> barrel-the
> most recent issue included one of my shots from last year  
> ("Genetics")-which
> was, to say the least, a bit of a contrast from the rest of the fare  
> in that
> issue.
>
>
>
> That image was also posted to the LUG last year, and can be seen at
> http://www.blurb.com/books/612851
>
>
>
> For those who are film fans, I urge you to check out Tom  
> Abrahamsson's piece
> (in the same "Viewfinder" issue) on shooting a cache of 1931 nitrate  
> stock
> (now rated as ISO 1 or thereabouts.)
>
>
>
> Jim Shulman
>
> Wynnewood, PA
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Obviously debased standards)