Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:02:31 -0700
References: <383E97D8-9E09-4AC1-BACA-08495ACF322A@gmail.com> <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36052E95C3@case-email.casefoods.com>
 
Very simple:

    Leica
-   Nikon
------------
   HUGE difference

for *any* definition of difference.

The only way a Nikon can match a Leica is if you cover the Nikon logo with a
piece of black tape and then draw a red logo on it, and call it a "Leica
D3X."

And David, whip yourself with a wet noodle for being so "moire" clever :-)

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:39 AM, David Rodgers <drodgers at 
casefarms.com>wrote:

> Thein,
>
> >>The D3x still has an AA filter, and while it has the best per-pixel
> detail I've seen, it doesn't come close to the M8/DMR/CFV. Those cameras
> have no AA filter.<<
>
> Could you please be moir? specific regarding "doesn't come close"?
>
> DaveR
>



-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.rfman.com
// b: http://rfman.wordpress.com
Replies: Reply from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
 In reply to: Message from mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)