Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Assuming that we're discussing
photographs and photographers
seriously pursuing the art and craft;
what, exactly, does
"nothing there"
mean?
It's one thing to have a predilection
for social documentary photography;
and quite another thing
to imagine other visual subjects and approaches
as having "nothing" of value for the viewer;
not to mention the various approaches
within the medium's historical context.
For me, as a photographer and lover of photographs,
social documents
candid or formal portraits
wildlife studies
landscapes
cloud studies
macro and micro studies
architectural studies
sports studies
so called fine art photographs
cutting, bleeding edge photographs
(what am I may be missing?)
oh nudes (of course)
and even advertising photographs
all have practitioners ranging from Extraordinary to Mediocre.
Some achieve a consistent high level of craft;
a smaller number consistently reach for and achieve Art.
Each will benefit from the finest possible printing techniques,
papers and other relevant materials.
Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
On Sep 8, 2008, at 6:13 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
> If there is nothing there to begin with