Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Mon Jun 23 15:43:49 2008
References: <f2f825f20806230930g46c6412fsb4ef3d76941d20cd@mail.gmail.com><0K2X002H2L8VHB50@l-daemon><200806232310.m5NNAgfd049476@mail.imagecraft.com> <20080623182722.4ea4cb08@desktop-philfo.here>
 
Philip, I don't have either lens, but I think that Victor's shot owes more
to post processing than the capture. Victor has a distinctive look that he
aims for, too. Victor, feel free to disprove my impression!
My two cents.

Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/

-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: [Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON

I think the Noctilux is just too good and won't glow like the
Canon .95. Sometimes lenses can be made too well and the Nocti vs. .95
Canon is perfect example. Also, at 1/10 the price, the Canon wins in my
book.
PhilFo

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
 In reply to: Message from vroger at gmail.com (Victor Rubin) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)