Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Comparing Scanning vs. Duplicating
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun Nov 11 13:39:47 2007
 
> PESO:
> 
> Here are the comparisons of the Kodachrome slide scanned vs
> duplicated with actual pixel crops:
> 
> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/scanning_
> 
> What do you think?  I think I'm going to experiment some more with
> the scanner and see if I can get better color and less grain using
> GEM and ROC.  64 ISO films should not be this grainy but Kodachrome
> seems to scan that way.
> 
> Tina
> 
> Tina Manley
> ASMP, NPPA, EP, PI
> http://www.tinamanley.com
> 
I'm not following what "duplicated" means!

A dope when it comes to dupe.

Mark William Rabiner
markrabiner.com
Replies: Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Comparing Scanning vs. Duplicating)
 In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Comparing Scanning vs Duplicating)