Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/06/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Now RAW effecient Workflow?. old -- RAW or JPEG? ;-)
From: jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore)
Date: Mon Jun 18 10:31:25 2007
References: <8c8849060706151904y4caf21bdpf6cdba9feb0b2307@mail.gmail.com> <46737D1A.7040306@nathanfoto.com> <8c8849060706161155v5dcc149dkcddd810172d6d65b@mail.gmail.com> <1487761758.20070617101606@mcclary.net>
 
2007-06-17-11:16:06 Harrison McClary:
> If you like iPHOTO and want to upgrade to something more powerful get
> Aperture.  It is awesome.

Does it support DNGs from the M8 and DMR yet?  That for me has been the
barrier to even considering Aperture.

Oh, on a completely different subject...  it was fascinating to notice
that your email client is "The Bat!" -- I think that's the first time
I've noticed that client being used by someone I actually wanted to
receive email from.  I associate it with mass-emailers trying to sell me
stuff I don't want, and indeed my spam-detection heuristics add a few
points when they see that client.  I guess it must have good bulk email
sending facilities, or something.  One assumes it must be a decent
regular email client, as well, though, for you to have chosen it.
Replies: Reply from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Now RAW effecient Workflow?. old -- RAW or JPEG? ;-))
 In reply to: Message from jsjgroups at gmail.com (Jerry Justianto) ([Leica] Now RAW effecient Workflow?. old -- RAW or JPEG? ;-))
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Now RAW effecient Workflow?. old -- RAW or JPEG? ;-))
Message from jsjgroups at gmail.com (Jerry Justianto) ([Leica] Now RAW effecient Workflow?. old -- RAW or JPEG? ;-))
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Now RAW effecient Workflow?. old -- RAW or JPEG? ;-))