Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Kodachrome vs Film
From: telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr)
Date: Mon May 28 20:13:27 2007

It goes to the Kodak processing lab - in this case Dwayne's.  I've never had 
a problem with the Rite-aid service.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com


-----Original Message-----
>From: Tom Schofield <tomschofield@comcast.net>
>Sent: May 28, 2007 7:44 PM
>To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodachrome vs Film
>
>But then you run the risk of having your Kodachrome souped in E-6  
>because the new kid opening the envelopes doesn't know the  
>difference. :-(
>
>How sad - my spell check does not even recognize the word  
>Kodachrome!  I guess the Kodachrome era really is over.  Signs of the  
>times!!!!!!!!
>
>Tom
>
>
>On May 28, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Douglas Herr wrote:
>> You might also try a local Rite-aid pharmacy (or whatever you have  
>> in your area).  The turnaround is considerably faster and the price  
>> is only a little more than a mailer from B&H.  I've switched to  
>> E100G for my slide film because I don't want to depend on a single  
>> K14 lab.
>>
>>
>> Doug Herr
>> Birdman of Sacramento
>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from dale-reed at worldnet.att.net (Dale Reed) ([Leica] Kodachrome vs Film)