Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: new M8 IR filter report
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Tue Apr 3 23:43:06 2007
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0704031220240.31164@mail.2alpha.com> <2DFDFCE7-CDCA-4C96-85FA-844AC63E2B80@ciudad.com.ar> <017501c77648$164ee2e0$42eca8a0$@net> <0AF582F2-4E91-4CE7-8408-9A614B0EE8F7@ciudad.com.ar>
 
At 11:41 PM -0300 4/3/07, Eduardo Albesi wrote:
>
>
>I think it is better not only as you say from a practical point of 
>view, but also from a theoretic point of view to mount permanently 
>the filters.

Except when the filter degrades the image more than the extra IR 
would. Which sometimes happens. Sometimes. Choose your poison. :-) Or 
just take pictures.

>Best,
>
>Ed

-- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
In reply to: Message from pklein at 2alpha.net (Peter Klein) ([Leica] Re: new M8 IR filter report)
Message from eduardoalbesi at ciudad.com.ar (Eduardo Albesi) ([Leica] Re: new M8 IR filter report)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Re: new M8 IR filter report)
Message from eduardoalbesi at ciudad.com.ar (Eduardo Albesi) ([Leica] Re: new M8 IR filter report)