Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Tina said what?!
From: rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Mon Dec 18 06:28:24 2006
References: <95702C7B-8FAF-44BF-9B9B-50ED6E99483C@mac.com>
 
Tina had posted some comparison shots, which were discussed in a long thread 
("High ISOs Comparison", began dec. 6th):

M8 ISO 2500 crop:
http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/71279705
D5 3200 ISO crop:
http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/71279695

"More noise" - yes - "greater resolution" - not shure.

Didier



>>Tina Manley wrote:
>>. . .high ISOs with the M8 may have had more noise (but greater  
>>resolution) than the Canon high ISOs. . .
>
>
>Other than saying what you want to believe, is there any PROOF to  
>back up such a remark?
>I have not seen anyone else make such a bold claim, and from what I  
>can see with MY eyes, by the time you've Noise Ninja-ed the execrable  
>high-ISO noise from an M8 image any perceived resolution edge is out  
>the window.
>rs
In reply to: Message from schneiderpix at mac.com (Robert Schneider) ([Leica] Tina said what?!)