Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>This is a photograph that I already showed exactly as below here. I
>shot it on Fuji NPS160, with professional development, but had it
>scanned commerially on low res: all flattened out.
>
>http://tinyurl.com/y4o8pq
>or bigger:
>http://tinyurl.com/tbwgw
>
>
>
>This is the same shot after I let Alien Skin (and some minor
>additional PS alterations) have a go at the original scan today:
>
>as big as above:
>http://tinyurl.com/y373rf
>
>!!! the big ones are in Adobe RGB !!!
>
>Isn't the 2nd one much more distinctive and doesn't it have a lot
>more character? Or am I just overenthousiastic?
>
>Philippe
Hi Philippe,
The plug in just seems to increase contrast, throw a lot of the
extended tonal range away and skew the colours to introduce a cast.
This is usually what I fight to get rid of when scanning.
Film, properly printed lets me get a huge tonal range and a good
printer was always able to handle the colours properly. My scans,
even with a fairly good scanner, are usually limited in comparison to
projected slides or a good print.
I'm sorry, but the first image, while not necessarily optimized,
allows all sorts of interpretations, but the second looks like a poor
scan. It is a 'film' look, but one that mimics something I try to
avoid - not always successfully.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com