[Leica] The Negative

[afterswift at aol.com (afterswift@aol.com)]

 Hi Everyone,
 
 There's been a lot of handwringing -- or exultation -- over the retreat of 
film format cameras on the list. I think we're overlooking one of the 
foundational aspects of photography since the negative was invented. That 
is, the negative itself. For all practical purposes not even a digital FF 
ultimate Leica M-TK can produce a true negative.
 
 Why is the negative so important? Because it's the permanent die of a 
photographic image. Sure, I love to use my two fine digital cameras, but 
when the subject assumes the importance of a historical document -- in 
whatever field -- I switch to film. That's a personal decision. 
 
 Related to the negative is its access by direct optical means. Since the 
advent of digital I must admit that I produce very few prints. But I do 
print my new negatives either the darkroom way or via my good old HP 720 
printer from a Kodak CD. That's a double backup, ladies and gentlemen. 
 
 I hope we won't be singing dirges about the passing of Leica M-7s 
Rolleiflexes, Hassels, etc. I don't think they're headed toward the Eastman 
Museum in Rochester.
 Many of us will march behind the Silver flag into the future. Just one 
man's opinion.
 
 Best,
 Bob
 
    
 
   
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL.  Most comprehensive set of free safety and security 
tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, 
free AOL Mail and more.