Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I must be looking at a different set
What I see is a opening shot from an airplane.
After landing, a car ride (next 3 shots)
Then a walk in a concrete park ("I LOVE SWIS...")
Then ending shot at the waiting lounge at the airport.
http://www.kellymcerlean.com/geneva%5Bphoto%5D.htm
There is definitely a Beginning, a Middle and an End
from what I can tell. Pretty bleak day you had in Geneva, Kelly.
Thanks for posting. I rather enjoy the series.
- Phong
-----Original Message-----
>From: SonC@aol.com
>For example, I don't see why the two women, the beat up car, the guy in the
>
>train, and the guy fixing his shoe are in the set. None of those seem
>related to each other, or to the set.
>
>The three airplane included shots, have only that in common, (maybe
>Number
>one and the last one can be considered formal composition, but the
>falling-in
>walls detract from the airplanes, and kinda bring them into a twin-towers
>concept that doesn't make me too happy.
>
>The empty train car and the ATM/ticket machines or whatever they are, are a
>
>little more successful, though neither get you to a place. The unbalanced
>composition and mixed light throw me on the machines. It would be better
>without
> the girl, the empty car would be better with one person besides the
>motorman.
>
>That leaves the shadow figure, the moving people and the escalator, all of
>which say transportation, somehow, but don't intrigue me.
>
>All in all, you need to think of a photo essay just like you do a film.
>Establish, Medium shot, close-up, cutaway or reaction, reestablish, etc.
>
>Beginning, Middle End. That's what is missing here. Also a relationship
>to
>Geneva.